Kara Hill, DHCA, MHA, BSSW
Senior Director of Health Integration
Texas Health Institute

Trust is one of the most critical, yet one of the most underdeveloped components of our health and research systems. Programs, policies, and studies often fail not because of poor design, but because they underestimate the role of trust in participation, uptake, and sustained impact.

Community Health Professionals (CHPs) are individuals in community-integrated roles, such as Community Health Workers (CHWs), doulas, peer specialists, and promotores, who are trusted members of the communities they serve. CHPs operate as more than just connectors between healthcare and social services to facilitate access to care and improve quality. They are trusted advisors to health systems and communities.

The Responsive Trust Network (RTN) is built on the premise: trust already exists in communities, and CHPs are the infrastructure that holds it. The RTN organizes, supports, and compensates existing trust so it can be used ethically and effectively to improve research, care delivery, system redesign, and transformation.

The RTN is intentionally structured to ensure accountability, shared leadership, and continuous learning. It operates through a co-led core team between the University of Houston and Texas Health Institute, supported by a CHP-led Advisory Committee that anchors decision-making in lived experience. The RTN maintains monthly virtual convenings with built-in feedback loops, and an additional group of CHPs meeting monthly to focus specifically on rural health priorities. The group also manages a CHP-focused and led WhatsApp community for real-time resource sharing and trust-building. This structure is how we sustain engagement, remain responsive, and keep building trust over time.

Why this Model Matters

Strong evidence shows that CHPs improve outcomes, strengthen care experiences, and reduce avoidable utilization when integrated into care and research in meaningful ways. Randomized and implementation studies demonstrate improvements in quality of care, reductions in hospital use, and positive return on investment, particularly in Medicaid populations. 1, 2, 3

At the same time, research consistently shows that community engagement improves recruitment, retention, and relevance, especially among populations historically underrepresented in research. 4, 5 Yet engagement is often rushed, underfunded, or treated as an advisory add-on rather than a core research function.

The RTN provides opportunities to health systems, including hospitals, clinics, health plans, public health agencies, researchers, community-based organizations, and social service networks, by treating trust as infrastructure, not a random “add-on” or vague concept.

What makes the Responsive Trust Network Different

The RTN is designed to make community engagement sustainable, repeatable, ethical, and operational, rather than one-off or performative.

  • A prepared network. The RTN supports standing relationships with trained CHPs, so systems and researchers are not starting from zero because engagement is or should be required for any system or research to work.
  • Stronger research and program design. By involving CHPs early, the RTN helps shape questions, recruitment strategies, and implementation approaches that reflect lived experience and real-world constraints.
  • Sustainability beyond grants. Evidence shows CHP programs are most effective when aligned with system priorities like access, quality, and cost, not temporary pilots. 6

Why the Responsive Trust Network Matters Now

Public health emergencies, workforce shortages, and widening inequities have made clear that systems need trusted, community-based capacity they can activate quickly and responsibly. Trusted messenger models used during COVID-19 demonstrated how community-rooted approaches can improve reach and uptake when credibility matters most. 7, 8

The RTN builds that capacity before the crisis, study, or initiative begins.

The Bottom Line

The RTN reframes trust as something systems can invest in, strengthen, and sustain. By positioning CHPs as valuable partners and by creating clear structures for engagement, the RTN improves research quality, supports better care, and helps health systems work with communities rather than asking communities to adapt to them. The RTN positions CHPs as experts and leaders in trust building and responsiveness. This ensures they are central, not just a piece in the puzzle or commodity to be used.  

References

  1. Kangovi, S., et al. (2018). Effect of community health worker support on clinical outcomes and quality of care. JAMA Internal Medicine, 178(12), 1638–1647.
  2. Kangovi, S., et al. (2020). Evidence-based community health worker program and return on investment for Medicaid. Health Affairs, 39(6), 939–947.
  3. Whitley, E. M., et al. (2006). Measuring return on investment of outreach by community health workers. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 17(1), 6–15.
  4. Brockman, T. A., et al. (2023). Community engagement strategies to promote recruitment and participation in clinical research: A narrative review. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science.
  5. Assfaw, A. D., et al. (2025). Community engagement, recruitment, and retention of historically minoritized groups in Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias research: A synthesis of evidence. Alzheimer’s & Dementia.
  6. Milbank Memorial Fund. (2025). State strategies for engaging community health workers amid federal policy shifts.
  7. Caballero, A., et al. (2023). Strategic combination of theory, plain language, and community input to equip community messengers for COVID-19 vaccine education. Health Promotion Practice.
  8. Stiehl, E., et al. (2025). Engaging trusted messengers in public health response. Vaccine.